Another liberal dumbass strikes at the opinion column: Discrimination in the classroom...

YES, this one is going to prove itself worthy. After a minimal amount of research on our subject, I found something very interesting in his files on stalkersearch. tzb114@psu.edu, seems to think that the issue of abortion is hilarious, otherwise, what would be the reason for saving something so heinous? Anyways, Timothy will be spared of my abortion rant for now, but don't you readers worry, It will come in time. Anyways, back to the issue, Timothy wrote into the The Daily Collegian with the following letter to the editor:

"Discrimination comments show Republican beliefs

Once again, the College Republicans have amazed me with their flagrant hypocrisy. In a statement published in
The Daily Collegian Wednesday, Vicky Cangelosi stated that "Discrimination is discrimination," in reference to the supposed liberal bias in classroom settings ("UCLA alum offers money for proof of bias," Feb. 1).

However, isn't Cangelosi's political group affiliated with the party that believes in discrimination only when the Constitution explicitly spells it out? Indeed, she is. So who is she to talk about discrimination? United States Senate Republicans from every state scramble to ensure that discrimination policies remain etched in stone and do not expand to meet the times. But of all the discrimination debates, political discourse in an academic environment is not a form of discrimination.

Perhaps if the College Republicans had something remotely articulate to say in these classes, there could be real debate instead of this incessant whining. The College Republicans need to come back into reality where there is separation between what is actually discrimination and what is just a persecution complex.

Timothy Best
junior - biochemistry and molecular biology"


Timothy obviously is a dumb ass, as he has completely missed the whole point of the whole "discrimination" debate, but I wouldn't expect much more from a liberal. After all, they are dumb asses. His claim of Republican's sticking to the strict doctrine of the Constitution is more flattering than it is insulting once you realize that he has spoken out in error. What Timothy got wrong lies in what discrimination is being committed. He claims, "...political discourse in an academic environment is not a form of discrimination" which is a somewhat viable argument. If a teacher wants to explain the goings on of the political environment to his/her class, when applicable, they [professors] are welcome to. However, discrimination starts when students, when faced with a political bias spewing forth from their profs, makes them uneasy and worried about voicing their opinion for fear of academic retaliation. Sound far feched? Try again. I've heard many stories of students who had to falsify papers betraying their own opinions just because some liberal teacher would, and had, given them a worse grade for it [their true opinion] in the past. Most of these biases come up during the non-science/math classes that we are forced, as "academics", to take. You don't hear about how bad social security is when you're studying 3-phase power, which is why the sciences are great. Nonetheless, not all classes, I suppose, can be science classes and therefore we are forced to take the standard pre-reqs and it is in those classes that liberal professors try to work their magic. Timothy, unfortunately, is so close minded that he probably thinks this is an impossibility. However, being a dumb ass, he is clearly wrong. No one would care if a professor tried to bring a little politics into the class, asking for opinions of students and encouraging debate. Yet, when the students feel threatened by the professors' overwhelming political/homosexual/activist bias, the line must be drawn. Our friend Timothy clearly decided he wouldn't put on his thinking cap when he got out of bed and wrote that article. I can see how a liberal wouldn't think there was any bias in higher academics, because frankly, most of the teachers are liberals themselves. So maybe his ignorance is due to a lack of diversity. Now wouldn't that be something. As I've continued to say, the liberal motto is, "free speech for all, as long as we agree". Seriously....WTF!

(The Black Caucus made allegations last semester about the environment on campus not being conducive to learning do to "racial" tensions and discrimination. Sparked only by one incident of pure childishness, we we're forced to endure months of whining by the Black Caucus about said incident and the subsequent phantom climate. The liberals on campus backed them. What is different with the situation of political bias in the classrooms? Think about that one and write a comment.)

(I will, later, go on to discuss this phantom "racial" climate on campus and how I believe the whole ordeal about it was really just a stunt for leverage.)